Fiery Capitol Hill Clash: AG Pam Bondi Defends DOJ Handling of Epstein Files Amid Lawmaker Outrage
Washington, D.C. – February 12, 2026 – In a tense and often combative hearing before the House Judiciary Committee, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi faced sharp criticism from both Democratic and some Republican lawmakers over the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) management of files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The session, which lasted over five hours, highlighted deep partisan divides, with Democrats accusing the DOJ of inadequate redactions that exposed sensitive victim information, while Bondi defended her department’s actions and redirected scrutiny toward prior administrations.
fortune.com
Pam Bondi’s Epstein testimony devolves into name calling as she sweeps her own past behavior under the rug | Fortune
The hearing centered on the DOJ’s release of millions of pages of Epstein-related documents earlier this year, including investigative files that critics say contained poorly redacted details about survivors, potentially endangering their privacy. Epstein survivors attended the proceedings, seated prominently behind Bondi, wearing shirts protesting the redactions. Lawmakers repeatedly pressed Bondi on whether she would apologize directly to these victims for the DOJ’s handling of the files.
Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) directly challenged Bondi: “Will you turn to them now and apologize for what your Department of Justice has put them through with the absolutely unacceptable release of the Epstein files and their information?” Bondi declined to turn around, instead responding that she was “deeply sorry for what any victim has been through” in her opening statement but refused to offer a specific apology for the document releases, calling some questions “theatrics.”
axios.com
4 takeaways from Pam Bondi’s heated House hearing on Trump and Epstein files
Exchanges grew heated throughout the day. Bondi sparred with Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), a former constitutional law professor, whom she reportedly called a “washed-up loser lawyer” during one testy back-and-forth. She also clashed with Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) over questions about how many of Epstein’s co-conspirators had been indicted under her tenure. Bondi emphasized ongoing investigations but provided few specifics, stating, “We have pending investigations in our office.”
Republicans on the committee offered more supportive questioning, focusing on immigration enforcement and other priorities, though some expressed frustration with the overall tone. The hearing devolved into shouting matches at times, with Democrats accusing Bondi of orchestrating a “cover-up” by shielding powerful figures while inadequately protecting victims.
abc7.com
Attorney General Pam Bondi grilled over Epstein files, targeting of Trump’s political foes before the House Judiciary Committee – ABC7 Los Angeles
The controversy stems from the DOJ’s efforts under the Epstein Files Transparency Act to release documents while redacting victim-identifying information. Critics, including survivors and lawmakers, argue that nude photos and other private details slipped through, prompting removals after public outcry. Bondi noted that files were removed once issues were identified and pledged investigations into any criminal wrongdoing related to the mishandling.
ABC News correspondent Rachel Scott reported on Bondi’s response when pressed to apologize directly to Epstein’s survivors. In post-hearing coverage, survivors expressed frustration, with one telling NBC News that Bondi “didn’t answer a single question” and refused meaningful engagement. Scott highlighted the emotional weight of the moment, as victims raised their hands when asked if they had been unable to meet with DOJ officials.
abcnews.go.com
Rachel Scott – ABC News
Bondi, a longtime Trump ally and former Florida Attorney General, used the platform to praise President Trump’s leadership and accuse Democrats of politicizing the issue. She deflected many questions by referencing actions under her predecessor, Merrick Garland, and insisted the DOJ was committed to transparency while protecting victims.
npr.org
DOJ releases additional Epstein files as it removes others : NPR
The Epstein case continues to captivate public attention, with the files revealing connections to high-profile figures across politics and business. While some releases have named individuals like former President Bill Clinton and others mentioned in prior documents, Bondi has directed investigations toward certain Democrats cited in the materials, as requested by President Trump.
Survivors and advocates called the hearing a missed opportunity for accountability. One survivor told reporters post-hearing that the focus should remain on justice for victims rather than partisan sparring.
The session underscored the polarized atmosphere on Capitol Hill, where even oversight hearings on sensitive matters like Epstein’s legacy descend into confrontation. As the DOJ faces ongoing scrutiny, questions linger about future releases, prosecutions, and whether additional safeguards will protect those who suffered under Epstein’s abuse.
